Flatmate interview techniques
Most of the people that I've ever flatted with have been friends, or friends of friends so I've never really had to do the whole "flatmate interview" thing. Which, after reading this tale from Cassie, makes me really glad...
"I used to only ever interview cute guys for the room and would always end up nailing them. If I was being interviewed for a room in a sharehouse, I would only ever take the room if the share mate was a. a guy b. a cute guy c. single . I was a complete slut. It was like an addiction. My ego was huge. At the time, I never felt bad - I figured if they were dumb enough to get seduced (and believe me, guys are EASY - they NEVER offered a challenge), more fool them.Ahem. Do you know someone like this? Share your story with us all!
COMMENT:
AUTHOR: Dirk Diggler
EMAIL: dirk@hotmail.com
DATE: 2006-05-10 11:52:14
Cassie - you rule. I'll be your flatmate anytime... I meet all your criteria, and it would be my pleasure to be dumb enough to be seduced by you. But first let's see a photo of you to see whether you meet my criteria? How about you submit it to Dave so he can blog it up on this site for us to see? Now that would be fun! Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Comments
DATE: 2006-05-10 17:06:03
dirk diggler, you are a foul foul person
cassie...wrong...very wrong
Posted by: catch | July 10, 2006 08:44 AM
DATE: 2006-05-11 00:04:36
'Nailing' ... not a very nice word!
However, as someone who has had intimate encouters with but a few Flatmates/Housemates, although not a bad thing ALWAYS causes complications!
That is not to mean I will never do so again ... only to warn all of you so it's doesn't come as a surprise when sh*t hits the fan.
Enjoy
P.S. Love the idea of having pics up ... ;-)
Posted by: prime-mass | July 10, 2006 08:44 AM
DATE: 2006-05-10 21:42:12
I think its sad, that sex is still such a big taboo. Nailing someone should be as natural as shaking their hand. I sure wish someone would shake mine more often. Even if it's just to say "hi"
Posted by: STEVE | July 10, 2006 08:44 AM
DATE: 2006-05-11 10:39:15
Yes yes yes.... let's have some pictures.......pleeeeeaaaasssee!
Posted by: Dirk Diggler | July 10, 2006 08:44 AM
DATE: 2006-05-11 11:23:49
*looks around*
*shakes head,*
*smacks forehead*
That's the interview right there.
And look at the candidates coming out of the woodwork already.
heh
Posted by: The M@ | July 10, 2006 08:44 AM
DATE: 2006-05-12 14:30:30
GIRLS ARE EVIL! She's even worse then most guys. Besides if you play the game (they were dumb enough to get seduced and believe me) then you're an evil bitch/ bastard. "guys are EASY", damn everyone is easy if you LIE to them.
AND you SHOULDN't -- THat's the POINT.
Posted by: jack | July 10, 2006 08:44 AM
DATE: 2006-05-13 11:57:32
Steady on everyone...Although Cassie sounds like a bit of a slapper, I'm thinking that for most of the guys she ended up in bed with, it was probably like Christmas for them. It takes two to do the horizontal cha-cha!
Posted by: Dave the Editor | July 10, 2006 08:44 AM
DATE: 2006-05-14 05:40:30
Dave is right in that it takes two to have shared sex (or more than two) and Cassie probably didn't hog-tie these guys and force them into erections and having sex (although it IS possible to do that since the male physiology can react even if he doesn't wish to participate whereas a female physiology won't 'ready' itself for the act unless she's really mentally into it...strange but true)...so rape IS a possibility although not a very believable one in the Cassie scenarios.
The fact that anyone would go onto a public website and Proclaim "Hey World! I'm a huge SLUTTTTTT and if I find a guy remotely attractive I'll open up and lie down for it!" ...that fact is really, incredibly sad. WOW! Whatta girl for him to take home to Mum once he's ready to buy a diamond ring!~
Give THAT one some thought ladies & gentlemen!~ ;)~
I'm not against having some fun, some romance, some exploration... but there are limits and there should be criteria beyond "i was horny and he was remotely cute" AND shouting your many indiscretions from the rooftops is really just bad form and puts you in a poor light.
Posted by: ~Maggie!~ | July 10, 2006 08:44 AM
DATE: 2006-05-16 10:47:29
... i'm with you, m@. there's nothing wrong with being sexually liberated, babe. but too much hand-shaking, and your good ol' goodies are going to rot off.
besides, i kind of don't think cassie's real. sounds like a guy indulging in a little fantasy-posting. a little too desperate and grabby. usually, chicks aren't so ready to divulge slag-ish details of their past... not with that kind of pride, anyway.
probably a dude.
have a nice day, everybody!
Posted by: kerri | July 10, 2006 08:44 AM
DATE: 2006-05-18 20:05:26
Looks like that caused a bit of a stir. Ha! Get THIS. I posted an ad on a 'popular' roommate site. I ended up corresponding with a couple of people, had a boost juice with one of them, a cocacola rep, over at Surfers. He was a bit of a headcase. I ended up getting an email from this guy in Spain. After doing the email 'back and forth' thing, he deposited $500 into my bank account as a deposit, and 3 weeks later I went and picked him up at the airport in Brisbane and brought him home.
He's a complete spunk, 26 years old and we shag every chance we get. Kerri, I'm not a bloke. I am comfortable with whatever I do, tho. Slaggish! Ha! Thanks! Fantasy is reality, Baby! I think you're maybe jealous.
Posted by: Cassie | July 10, 2006 08:44 AM
DATE: 2006-05-22 07:35:23
I'm with Maggie.
And most likely you are either completely lieing or just have some trouble mentally. A real 'slut' would not actually admit to being a slut, or atleast not in such a fashion. But whatever. I'm just glad I'm not living your life, Cassie. Hope you don't get some fatal STD or something. Cheers!
Posted by: Megga | July 10, 2006 08:44 AM